take 1 moment

Is Mesh enough to keep MS in the game for the long run?  It certainly has the marks of Ray Ozzie and as many bloggers and commenters have stated, it looks like a Groove Web 2.0.  Groove was the Ray Ozzie’s project before he moved over to Redmond.  And before that he was Mr. Lotus Notes.

Groove is now an optional part fo MS Office, a far cry from the original intentions.  And Groove had potential as a Lotus Notes 2nd generation.  Why didn’t it succeed?

It was as if Ray Ozzie and his team stopped half-way then, it was trying to be open, but only so much.  It aimed at replacing Lotus Notes, but it limited itself to the Windows world.  It wanted to break into the small and mediumed business market, but failed to understand the investment decision processes of that market.  It wanted to become viral, yet it wanted to charge 70 or was it 100$ per user and many potential customers could not run Groove, because you needed a really powerful PC.  It wanted to empower the user to create and share spaces, yet introduced complex and infrastructure heavy top down certifications in order to please potential corporate IT departments.  It wanted to become a haven for a developer community, but rarely listened to them.  Made important changes without involving their best supporters.

Even then Ray Ozzie seemed a little out of touch, his old blog is testimony of that.  He seemed no not understand what openness means and therefore open source.   And it looks like he still doesn’t (and here) The paper is nicely written, uses words and definitions, which I like, but mmmhh.  It’s the consequence, the solution which doesn’t fit.  It tries to put a mesh on Microsoft’s existing world, rather then prepare for what is coming.  It tries a unified top down approach, daddy Microsoft will take care.

At the moment the MS family try to adopt Yahoo.  Struggles a bit in the embrace that one.  MS is now having a big word with the foster parents, the Shareholder. Oh and later daddy will also talk to the rebel kids Mac and Linux and their cousin Google, don’t worry.

I am not worried, because that gigantic top down approach will not work.  MS has increasingly had trouble with big projects.  And MS has always been a little slow keeping up with the times and now they have Google and all the web players outrunning them.  BTW Google despite it’s size has a track record of starting small, sometimes even innocent projects which then take off.  Think of App Engine, let’s just get it out with Python, so what, developers trust Google to add other frameworks.  And building trust, well let’s say it’s not really the strong point of Microsoft.

I wanted to write just a few words anded ended up with more.  An even longer but interesting article can also be found on Bob Warfield’s SmoothSpan blog.

I would like to highlight interesting twitter stories which seem to appear like whirlwinds, they start slowly with the right conditions and then accelerate incredibly fast and might leave traces: people being stunned and surprised, anger, some emotionally hurt.  The first reactions are about blaming, calling for order, rules and technical solutions.

First there was the twitter mob, we are still learning, but we have acknowledged it.  Now there is another twistter (?), the privacy discussion.

A twitter user signed up for a twitter group service. In order to keep things private, the service asks you to create a new twitter account with the aliasname of the group.  Then you should sign up with that new alias twitter account.  By accidentaly signing in with the personal normal account, all the private messages became public.

The premacy of Twitter is by default everything is public, privacy is an option.  Therefore we have to be very careful when using twitter for very private messages.

Twitter is simple, therefore people love it and want to use it for all kinds of purposes.  The beauty of the web20, combine things.  By mashing up services we need to learn to deal with the increasing complexity of the privacy issues.

Let’s not blame the very thing we love about twitter, the simplicity.  The discussion about group features of twitter is ongoing and I like the way twitter has not rushed in to just add more features. And maybe they shouldn’t because that could be done by 3rd party services like GroupTweet.com.  Or hashtags.org.  I like that growing ecosystem, because that allows us to have an incredible playground, try out new ideas, but also improve them or throw them away, try another approach.  It allows us to develop a free and open culture.

How about “twindergarten”?

I think I am showing the first signs of an infection! Ok, I have known about twitter since probably early 2007. My reaction then was: interesting - combining blogging techniques with instant meant messaging and SMS. And all that public, feeding into common stream of so called tweets, the cumulation of all individual twitter posts. Privacy is an option, a bit like an afterthought. And your account is either private or public, not public combined with some private tweets. It’s either - or. Sounds terrifying for non-twitterers, but that brutal simplicity makes twitter so scalable, so versatile and so attractive. More on that another time.

Back then I couldn’t see how microblogging would fit into my world and I followed the rise in popularity mainly as an observer. I was a bit more interested in Jaiku since they seemed more into the mobile world, scandinavian, nokiaish and then being bought by Google. Pownce seemed to me like another web communication service.

And then this year I read about a twittermob which happened at a conference during a high profile podium interview. What fascinated me wasn’t the why, nor the who or the what. It was the phenomon of the occurence of the mob, which was like a swarm and in retrospect a total overreaction. It was group dynamics at it’s best, or worst. Many “mobbers” apoligised publicly afterwards and said that they were taken away.

That triggered memories of communication technologies when they reached the mainstream. Mainly email and the mobile phone, to a lesser extend discussion forums and boards. Remember when we were learning how to use email in the 90s? The angry email exchanges which often started as a small misunderstanding and then snowballed into an avalanche of CCs and BCCs until the whole world knew about it. The first thing as a directory admin was to delete the ALL mail forward. Then we have learned quickly how to communicate with these new techniques, what words to use. If an email triggers an emotional reaction, best wait till tomorrow before fireing off a response which one might regret later. Same in forums and blogs. And we have learned to live with spammers and flamers, they are part of the ecosystem.

The twitter mob occurence told me that this kind of communication is going mainstream and I better should get into microblogging now.

Most web services are free, at least for the “basic” features.  One business model is to charge premium services like the professional network services such as LinkedIn and Xing.  Many web services which offer functionality such as project management, groupware, CRM, and even niche specialists for mindmapping, calendar planning try to use this method.  For most it will not work:

If the customer satisfaction can only be achieved with the commercial service package, the “free” part is nothing more than a teaser.  There is no more virality, because only satisfied users invite their friends and collegues.  And teaser services are the best way to lead your potential customers to your competitor.  Once your future-ex revenue generator has seen the benefit of that service, he will search for alternatives and if they are cheaper, he’ll stay there.

Hooking the customer because his friends or collegues are using that same service is barely tolerated.  Especially early adopters don’t like being hooked and they are the ones you need to start the web service business in most cases.  Hooking your customer is anti-social and an aggressive defensive move.  You don’t care about customer satisfaction, you try to keep him by bullying him. Companies who fear loosing market share use often those tactics which just delay the inevitable.  As a startup, that model is a nono.

And last but not least many of those premium services are artificially created.  The difference of premium and free is purely arbitrary.  Most customers will ask why?  And when the competitor is offering something similar or better  for free, your customers will be gone before you realised it.  Such an artificial premium service cannot be a longer term solution.

So when are premium services useful and acceptal? A commercial service should be aimed at satisfying additional benefits for very few customers. Or benefits which may be perceived as luxury. Or services which link in to contractual and systematic needs of corporations. Or transactional costs which are part of normal business or personal practices and therefore acceptable.

… has started quite a while ago.  I stumbled upon an article from 1992 by Tom Peterson his site.   Out of curiosity I read it and found this jewel:

“[The Body Shop International] Founder Anita Roddick said her marketing strategy (not that she’d ever use such a term) is to engage her patrons in “conversation.” When it comes to suppliers, customers, the work force — or domestic relations — conversation, information and gossip by the bushel are matchless tools.” 

 Was she ahead of her time? 

I came across this interesting interview with Ricardo Semler of the Brazilian Semco Group. And then I had a flashback. Yes Tom Peters wrote about Semco in “Liberation Management” (1992) - I think.  Gosh I am getting old…

Yesterday was “a day” and still winter, today is “b day” and spring*, then we’ll have Eastern…. what a week. Time to have some fun, so I decided to create a mailing list to blog test as a first of many creative combinations.

Had to do it with blogger, because wordpress.com doesn’t have this feature “yet”. BTW, dear automatticers, please let us include javascript & co.

* Spring normally starts on the 21st of March. In a leap year, spring starts on the 20th of March.  So not to forget the beginning of spring in 4 years time, here is a tip:  the olympic summer games always occur in the leap year.   Why?  Next question.

Couldn’t resist posting that one.

This is my first live blog from a conference, the web 2.0 expo in Berlin organised by O‘Reilly.  Although I am not going to turn this into a habit.
This expo is funny, one one hand it is an export of the successful web 2.0 conferences in the US.  And some of the American Internet  “crème-de-la-crème“ is giving keynote presentations.
Attendance is a lower than hoped by the organisers, the website somehow isn‘t a model of  clarity, the location of Halle 2 in Berlin is hmmm, cold and industrial .  On the plus-side that means, no problem to find a seat anywhere, be it in the keynote hall, or the smaller presentation rooms. And it is easy to have interesting conversations with visitors, exhibitors and presenters.

For starters look at this. My bets:

• Mindmapping will become a web service
• Integration with mashups
• Google will buy a webmapper or develop one, Yahoo will follow, Microsoft may want to integrate a desktop mindmapper for Office
• Mindmapping will become more ubiquitous, seamlessly integrated in web creation and browsing
• Mindmapping techniques will help to unclutter the web based experience, to map you friends on facebook & co, your competitors on linkedin etc…
• Mindmapping will have to find a way to integrate multple cores
• Mindmapping should become multidimensional

BTW, the grandfather of the MindMap concept, Tony Buzan, is now promoting his own application iMindMap. From what I could see, it’s a nice “artistic” look and feel, combined with touchscreen techniues. Much more in line with his philosophy than the competitors - of course. Only that kind of app is passé, n’est-ce pas.

Blogged with Flock

Tags: Tech, Web 2.0, wikimindmap, mindmapping, mindmap, Tony Buzan, iMindMap, facebook, linkedin, social software